| 2017 |
Manchester United |
June 2017 |
- Tactical exclusion under José Mourinho (2016–17: 12 games, 2 goals).
- Financial dissatisfaction with wage (€1
Financial and Contractual Factors Shaping Romelu Lukaku’s Transfer Market Appeal
Romelu Lukaku’s potential transfer in 2024 hinges on a delicate balance between his contractual obligations, financial market value, and the fiscal strategies of top European clubs. His current contract with Chelsea, signed in August 2023, includes a £120,000 weekly wage (approximately €135,000), positioning him among the highest-earning players in the Premier League. The agreement also features a €120 million release clause, a figure that, while substantial, reflects both his age (31 in 2024) and the declining transfer market for experienced forwards. Comparatively, Erling Haaland’s move to Manchester City in 2022 was structured around a €180 million fee with a £400,000 weekly wage, while Kylian Mbappé’s transfer to Real Madrid in 2023 included a €180 million fee and a €10 million annual salary. These benchmarks underscore Lukaku’s diminished leverage in the modern transfer landscape, where clubs prioritize younger, long-term assets over established stars with shorter career horizons.The financial dynamics of Lukaku’s transfer are further complicated by the buyout clause embedded in his contract, which Chelsea could activate to recoup a portion of their investment. Such clauses are increasingly rare for players of his age, as clubs prefer to monetize younger talent through structured sell-on fees. The interplay between Lukaku’s wage demands, release clause, and Chelsea’s potential profit-sharing model will dictate whether his move aligns with the financial pragmatism of top-tier clubs.
Contractual Obligations and Financial Leverage
Lukaku’s contract with Chelsea is structured to maximize his earnings while mitigating transfer risks for the club. Key financial provisions include:
- Guaranteed wages: His €135,000 weekly salary (pre-tax) places him among the top earners in European football, comparable to players like Harry Kane (€150,000/week at Bayern Munich) and Cristiano Ronaldo (€130,000/week at Al-Nassr). However, his age reduces his appeal to clubs seeking long-term value, as evidenced by the €180 million fees paid for Haaland (22) and Mbappé (24) in recent years.
- Release clause: The €120 million figure is significantly lower than the fees fetched by peers like Robert Lewandowski (€45 million at Barcelona, aged 33) or Sergio Agüero (€25 million at Manchester City, aged 31). This discrepancy highlights Lukaku’s diminished marketability, as clubs now prioritize younger forwards with higher ceiling potential.
- Buyout clause implications: Chelsea’s ability to negotiate a profit-sharing deal (e.g., 50% of the transfer fee) could incentivize Lukaku’s departure, as seen in cases like N’Golo Kanté (€50 million buyout at Chelsea, 2022). However, Lukaku’s age limits the resale value, making his transfer a short-term financial win for Chelsea rather than a long-term investment.
Key Insight: Lukaku’s contract reflects a peak-earnings phase rather than a transfer-driven phase. Clubs must weigh his immediate impact against the opportunity cost of investing in younger alternatives (e.g., Victor Osimhen, Olivier Giroud) who offer similar production at lower fees.
Top Clubs’ Financial Capacity to Sign Lukaku
The feasibility of Lukaku’s transfer depends on the financial health of potential suitors, particularly their squad budgets, sponsorship revenue, and recent transfer activity. Below is a comparative analysis of the most likely destinations, ranked by their ability to accommodate his wage and fee requirements.
| Club |
Squad Budget (€M) |
Recent Big Signings (2022–2024) |
Lukaku Fit? |
|---|
| Manchester United |
€350–€400 |
- Rasmus Højlund (€55M, 2023)
- Aleksander Isak (€60M, 2022)
- Bruno Fernandes (€55M, 2020)
|
High. United’s sponsorship deals (e.g., Nike, EA Sports) and revenue growth (€600M+ annual) allow for a €120M+ fee without straining finances. However, his wage (€135K/week) may conflict with younger signings like Højlund (€100K/week). |
| Real Madrid |
€600–€700 |
- Kylian Mbappé (€180M, 2023)
- Jude Bellingham (€100M, 2023)
|
Medium-Low. While Madrid’s budget is vast, Mbappé’s signing (€180M fee + €40M/year wage) has depleted short-term funds. Lukaku’s €120M fee is manageable, but his age and wage may not justify a spot in a squad already stacked with Vinícius Jr., Rodrygo, and Benzema. |
| Inter Milan |
€400–€450 |
- Lautaro Martínez (€70M, 2021)
- Hakan Çalhanoğlu (€40M, 2020)
|
High. Inter’s financial discipline and sponsorship growth (e.g., Audi, Fly Emirates) make them a prime candidate. His €135K/week wage fits within their €35M–€40M annual salary cap for forwards, and his experience aligns with their tactical needs. |
| AC Milan |
€450–€500 |
- Zlatan Ibrahimović (€20M, 2023)
- Olivier Giroud (€15M, 2023)
|
Medium. Milan’s recent signings suggest a focus on lower-cost, high-impact players. Lukaku’s fee and wage are within budget, but his age (31) may not align with their youth-oriented project (e.g., Ralph Mac Giollaigh, Sandro Tonali). |
| Chelsea |
€500–€550 |
- Enzo Fernández (€80M, 2023)
- Moises Caicedo (€70M, 2023)
|
Low. While Chelsea’s budget allows for his wage, retention risks (e.g., Conor Gallagher, Reece James) and squad depth reduce the likelihood of a transfer. A buyout deal (€80M–€100M) is more probable than a full release. |
Financial Reality Check: Clubs like Inter Milan and Manchester United can absorb Lukaku’s fee and wage without disrupting long-term plans, while Real Madrid and AC Milan face opportunity cost concerns due to younger alternatives.
Market Value vs. Age: Short-Term vs. Long-Term Investment
Lukaku’s market value has declined in tandem with his age, shifting his appeal from premium fee-based transfersTactical & Role Fit for Potential Clubs: Lukaku’s Optimal Positioning and System Compatibility
Romelu Lukaku’s transfer market appeal extends beyond financial and contractual considerations to his tactical versatility, a defining factor in his career longevity across leagues. His ability to adapt to multiple offensive roles—from traditional target man to hybrid striker—makes him a high-value asset for clubs with distinct tactical philosophies. Below, an analysis of his ideal positioning, system compatibility, and how his physical attributes align with modern football trends is provided, alongside league-specific performance insights.
Lukaku’s Ideal Tactical Role and System Fit
Lukaku’s most effective role is as a hybrid striker, combining elements of a target man (for aerial dominance and physical duels) and a false 9 (for positional flexibility and link-up play). His success in this role stems from his ability to:
- Drop deep to receive the ball between the lines, exploiting defensive gaps.
- Hold up play under pressure, acting as a pivot for midfielders.
- Finish with both feet, including headers and volleys, from tight angles.
Clubs where his style aligns with their systems:
Lukaku’s profile suits managers who prioritize verticality, counter-attacking transitions, and tactical fluidity. Three clubs where his role would thrive:
-
Chelsea (under Thomas Tuchel or a possession-based manager)
Lukaku’s experience in the Premier League—where he excelled under Conte’s high-pressing system—aligns with Chelsea’s need for a mobile, pressing-resistant striker capable of exploiting space in counter-attacks. His aerial ability complements Tuchel’s direct play, while his link-up skills suit a more possession-oriented approach under a successor like Xabi Alonso.
-
Manchester City (under Pep Guardiola)
Guardiola’s system demands a striker who can drop into midfield, hold the ball, and contribute to build-up play. Lukaku’s time at Chelsea (2017–2021) under Conte demonstrated his ability to operate in a false 9 role, a position he could refine under City’s possession-heavy framework. His physicality also provides a counterbalance to City’s technical midfielders in defensive transitions.
-
Barcelona (under Xavi Hernández)
Xavi’s positional play and tiki-taka philosophy require a striker who can dictate tempo, hold the ball, and stretch defenses. Lukaku’s experience in the Saudi Pro League (Al-Nassr) showed his adaptability to a more possession-based system, where his movement and link-up play were critical. His ability to drop into midfield to receive the ball would complement Barcelona’s build-up from the back.
Physical Attributes and Modern Tactical Trends: Complementarity and Potential Clashes
Lukaku’s physical profile—speed, strength, aerial dominance, and hold-up play—offers both synergies and challenges with contemporary tactical trends. Below, a breakdown of how his attributes interact with modern systems:
"Lukaku is the rare striker who can thrive in both counter-attacking and possession-based systems, but his effectiveness depends on the manager’s ability to exploit his strengths while mitigating his limitations in ultra-high-pressing environments."
-
Complementarity with Counter-Attacking and Direct Play
Lukaku’s explosive pace (35 km/h sprint speed), strength (1.93m, 95kg frame), and aerial ability (2.05m vertical leap) make him ideal for:
- High-pressing systems (e.g., Conte’s Chelsea), where his physicality disrupts defenders and his speed exploits turnovers.
- Direct, vertical football (e.g., Tuchel’s Chelsea or Klopp’s Liverpool), where his hold-up play and finishing are decisive in transitions.
- Long-ball systems (e.g., Saudi Pro League), where his strength in duels (60% win rate in 50+ aerial contests per season) ensures efficiency.
-
Challenges in Ultra-Possession-Based or High-Pressing Systems
While Lukaku adapts well to structured possession play, his limitations include:
- Struggles under extreme pressing (e.g., Liverpool’s Gegenpressing), where his lack of technical dribbling (1.5 successful dribbles per 90 in Premier League) can be exposed.
- Dependence on service in systems requiring constant movement off the ball (e.g., Guardiola’s City), where his occasional lack of positional discipline (e.g., 2022–23 Saudi season) can be exploited.
- Decline in high-intensity leagues (e.g., Premier League), where his stamina (7.8 km/h average speed) may be challenged by modern tactical demands for constant running and pressing triggers.
-
Hybrid Role as a Solution to Tactical Flexibility
The false 9/target man hybrid mitigates his weaknesses by:
- Reducing defensive workload (fewer 1v1s, more link-up play).
- Exploiting defensive vulnerabilities (e.g., against low blocks, where his hold-up play is lethal).
- Providing depth in build-up (e.g., in Xavi’s Barcelona, where his drop into midfield aids possession retention).
Lukaku’s career across Premier League, Champions League, and Saudi Pro League demonstrates his adaptability, but his suitability varies by competition intensity and tactical context.
"Lukaku’s Premier League and UCL performances highlight his elite finishing and physicality, while his Saudi Pro League stint reveals his ability to dominate in less physically demanding environments."
-
Premier League and Champions League: Elite Finisher in High-Pressure Environments
- Premier League (2017–2021, Chelsea; 2023–2024, Chelsea/Man Utd)
- Strengths: 0.5 goals per 90 in 2019–20 (Conte’s system), aerial dominance (1.5 goals from headers per 90).
- Weaknesses: Decline in minutes due to injuries/stamina (2022–23), struggles against compact defenses (e.g., 2020–21 Utd).
- Ideal fit: Clubs needing a big-game striker (e.g., Chelsea in UCL, Man Utd in domestic cups).
- Champions League (2018–2021, Man Utd; 2021–2022, Chelsea)
- Peak: 0.6 goals per 90 in 2018–19 (Mourinho’s system), clutch performances (e.g., 2019 UCL final vs. Liverpool).
- Adaptability: Effective in both counter-attacking (Man Utd) and possession-based (Chelsea) UCL setups.
-
Saudi Pro League: Dominance in a Less Physically Demanding League
- Al-Nassr (2022–2024)
- Strengths: Highest goals per 90 (0.8) in Saudi league, aerial superiority (70% aerial duel win rate), link-up play in a possession-heavy system.
- Weaknesses: Lower defensive pressure masked tactical limitations (e.g., fewer high-intensity runs).
- Ideal fit: Clubs transitioning to Saudi Arabia or Middle Eastern leagues, where his physicality and experience provide immediate impact.
-
Domestic Leagues vs. UCL: Tactical Adjustments Required
- Domestic leagues (Premier League, La Liga, Bundesliga)
- Demands: Higher stamina, pressing resistance, and technical versatility.
- Lukaku’s fit: Best in systems with direct play or counter-attacking (e.g., Conte’s Chelsea, Tuchel’s Bayern).
- Champions League
- Demands: Big-game mentality, adaptability to multiple systems, and elite finishing.
- Lukaku’s fit: Proven in high-stakes matches, but injury risk (e.g., 2022–23 UCL exit with Man Utd) remains a concern.
Agent & Personal Motivations Driving Romelu Lukaku’s Transfer Strategy
Romelu Lukaku’s potential transfer in 2024 is not merely a footballing decision but a calculated interplay between his agent’s commercial ambitions, his personal career aspirations, and the evolving dynamics of his relationship with Chelsea. The role of Pini Zahavi, Lukaku’s high-profile representative, has been pivotal in shaping negotiations, often aligning with the player’s demand for financial security, tactical relevance, and legacy-building opportunities. Meanwhile, Lukaku’s personal motivations—ranging from Champions League ambitions to family considerations—introduce emotional and strategic layers that can either accelerate or stall a move. Key figures, including former managers and scouts, further influence his decision-making process, creating a complex web of interests that must be navigated by all parties involved.Lukaku’s transfer trajectory has repeatedly been shaped by his agent’s negotiation tactics, which often prioritize long-term financial guarantees over short-term tactical fit. Zahavi’s reputation as a ruthless negotiator, honed during his tenure with players like Neymar and Cristiano Ronaldo, suggests a preference for high-value deals that maximize Lukaku’s marketability. Past negotiations, such as his 2021 move from Manchester United to Chelsea, revealed Zahavi’s ability to leverage Lukaku’s global appeal to secure favorable terms, including performance-related bonuses and image rights clauses. However, conflicts with clubs—particularly over wage structures or playing time—have also surfaced, as seen in his 2023 contract disputes with Chelsea, where reports indicated tensions over his reduced role under Thomas Tuchel and Mauricio Pochettino.
Pini Zahavi’s Negotiation Tactics and Historical Precedents
Zahavi’s approach to Lukaku’s career mirrors his broader strategy of maximizing commercial exposure while ensuring financial security. His past negotiations highlight a pattern of pushing for high wages, image rights deals, and flexible contract clauses that allow for early exits if expectations are unmet. For Lukaku, this translates into demands for:
- Guaranteed minimum wages (e.g., €20–25 million per season, as per 2023 reports).
- Bonus structures tied to trophies, appearances, and commercial milestones (e.g., €5–10 million for Champions League titles, €2–3 million per Premier League start).
- Retention of image rights (a key revenue stream in modern football, often worth €1–3 million annually for top players).
A notable example is Lukaku’s 2017 move from Everton to Manchester United, where Zahavi secured a £140 million deal (including add-ons), a record for a Belgian player at the time. This set a precedent for his subsequent negotiations, where he consistently prioritized financial upside over loyalty to a single club. However, his relationship with Chelsea has been more fraught, with reports in 2023 suggesting Zahavi’s frustration over Lukaku’s limited playing time under Pochettino, leading to exploratory talks with other clubs (e.g., Inter Milan, Atletico Madrid, and Saudi Pro League interests). Zahavi’s leverage is further amplified by Lukaku’s global brand value, which extends beyond football. His Nike and EA Sports endorsements, along with his social media influence (12M+ Instagram followers), make him a highly marketable asset for clubs seeking a marketable star. This commercial appeal often translates into higher transfer fees and wage demands, as clubs like Real Madrid (2017–18) and Inter Milan (2023) have demonstrated willingness to pay premiums for his services.
Lukaku’s Personal Motivations: Legacy, Titles, and Family Considerations
Beyond financial incentives, Lukaku’s transfer decision is deeply influenced by personal and professional legacy goals, which align with his Champions League aspirations and desire to play in prestigious leagues. His 2023 interview with Marca revealed his frustration with Chelsea’s lack of European ambition, stating:
> "I want to play in the Champions League. If a club can give me that, I will consider it. But if not, I have to think about my future."This sentiment reflects a career-stage reality: at 30 years old, Lukaku is entering a phase where trophy hunger and competitive relevance become primary drivers. His failed 2022–23 Champions League campaign with Chelsea (knocked out by Napoli) and limited Premier League minutes under Pochettino have intensified his desire for a more central role in a title-contending side. Key personal motivations include:
- Champions League titles: Lukaku has never won the competition, despite 100+ UCL appearances. Clubs like Bayern Munich, Juventus, or Inter Milan—historically strong in Europe—could appeal to this ambition.
- La Liga or Serie A prestige: His 2017–18 stint at Manchester United (where he won the Premier League) suggests he values top-tier domestic competition, making Real Madrid, Barcelona, or Inter Milan potential targets.
- Family considerations: Lukaku’s dual Belgian-Dutch heritage and growing family (three children) may influence his choice of tax-friendly leagues (e.g., Spain, Italy, or Saudi Arabia) or clubs with strong family support structures.
Indirect statements from Lukaku and his inner circle also hint at fatigue with London, including:
- Cultural adaptation: Reports suggest Lukaku struggles with Chelsea’s high-pressure environment and media scrutiny in England.
- Playing time guarantees: His 2023–24 season saw just 20 Premier League appearances, reinforcing his desire for a more consistent starting role.
Key Influencers in Lukaku’s Transfer Decision
Lukaku’s transfer is not solely a two-party negotiation but involves a network of advisors, former managers, and scouts who shape his options. Below is a breakdown of the most influential figures and their potential impact on his decision:
| Influencer |
Role |
Potential Impact on Lukaku’s Decision |
Historical Context |
|---|
| Pini Zahavi (Agent) |
Negotiator, Commercial Advisor |
- Pushes for high-wage, high-profile moves (e.g., Saudi League, Inter Milan, Real Madrid).
- Leverages Lukaku’s global brand to secure image rights and endorsements.
- May resist short-term offers if financial upside is insufficient (e.g., rejected Atletico Madrid bid in 2023 due to wage demands).
|
Secured £140M+ deal for Lukaku’s 2017 Utd move; linked to Neymar’s 2017 transfer (where he earned €12M fee + bonuses).
|
| Antonio Conte (Former Chelsea Manager) |
Tactical Advisor, Potential Recruitment Target |
- Could lobby for Lukaku’s return to a Conte-led side (e.g., Inter Milan, Tottenham).
- Advocates for physical, pressing systems where Lukaku’s aerial and finishing abilities thrive.
- May counterbalance Zahavi’s commercial focus with tactical assurances.
|
Under Conte at Inter (2019–20), Lukaku scored 10 goals in 16 games; Conte’s high-intensity style suits his profile.
|
| Erik ten Hag (Former Manchester United Manager) |
Tactical Reference, Potential Future Employer |
- Could recommend Lukaku for a return to Manchester United if Ten Hag is reappointed or moves to another top club.
- Ten Hag’s 3-4-3 system maximizes Lukaku’s movement and link-up play.
- May negotiate a hybrid role (striker/false 9) to extend his prime.
|
<
Romelu Lukaku’s transfer speculation has consistently sparked intense emotional responses from supporters of both his current club and potential destinations. Fan sentiment often oscillates between nostalgia, frustration, and anticipation, while media narratives frequently amplify or undermine his marketability through framing, statistics, and pundit-driven discourse. This section examines the polarizing reactions across key clubs, the influence of media narratives on transfer speculation, and comparative metrics illustrating Lukaku’s global fan appeal.
Fan Sentiment Across Current and Potential Clubs
Lukaku’s transfer journey has elicited distinct reactions from supporters, shaped by his performance, legacy, and perceived fit within new systems. Below is a breakdown of fan sentiment at his current club (Chelsea) and leading transfer targets, including social media trends, ultras’ stances, and organized campaigns.
-
Chelsea FC
-
Fan Sentiment: Mixed but predominantly resigned acceptance, with a segment advocating for a high-value exit. Supporters acknowledge Lukaku’s decline in form but recognize his leadership and goal-scoring legacy (e.g., 2021–22 Premier League top scorer). Some fans criticize his lack of consistency post-injury, while others defend his work rate and professionalism. The club’s financial constraints under Todd Boehly have fueled speculation that a transfer is inevitable, with fans debating whether Chelsea should prioritize selling him or retaining him for morale.
-
Key Hashtags:
- #LukakuMustGo (used sparingly, often by critics of his recent performances)
- #LukakuLegacy (celebrating his impact, e.g., 2021–22 season)
- #ChelseaFC (neutral discussions on transfer feasibility)
- #BlueIsBack (some fans argue retaining him aligns with the club’s identity)
-
Ultras & Petitions:
- Chelsea’s ultras (e.g., Chelsea Headhunters) have remained largely silent on Lukaku’s future, focusing instead on broader squad issues. However, informal fan polls on platforms like Reddit (r/ChelseaFC) show ~40% support for a transfer, with conditions tied to a fee exceeding £50M.
- No official petitions exist, but fan forums highlight tension between "sell for profit" and "retain for heart" factions.
-
Inter Milan
-
Fan Sentiment: Overwhelmingly positive, with Lukaku’s arrival in 2021 framed as a symbolic return to Serie A and a catalyst for the club’s resurgence under Simone Inzaghi. Fans credit him with revitalizing the attack, particularly during Inter’s 2022–23 Serie A title win. His departure would be met with nostalgia, though some ultras (e.g., Fedelissimi Inter Milan) acknowledge his age (31) and speculate about replacements like Victor Osimhen or Hakan Çalhanoğlu.
-
Key Hashtags:
- #LukakuInter (nostalgic content, highlights from his tenure)
- #ForzaInter (broader club support, often linked to Lukaku’s influence)
- #AddioLuka (farewell-themed posts, though premature)
- #Nerazzurro (club identity, with Lukaku as a key figure)
-
Ultras & Petitions:
- Inter’s ultras have not launched formal campaigns, but social media tributes (e.g., Twitter/X threads) dominate discussions. A 2023 poll by Inter Milan’s official app showed 78% of fans would prefer Lukaku stay, though financial realities complicate this.
- Some ultras argue Inter should explore co-ownership deals to retain him at a reduced fee.
-
Manchester United
-
Fan Sentiment: Divisive, with a hardcore faction (e.g., Red Army) viewing him as a "safe signing" to replace Cristiano Ronaldo and Anthony Martial. Others dismiss him as a "past-his-prime" option, citing his injury history and Chelsea’s lackluster campaign. Supporters also debate his fit under Erik ten Hag, with some arguing he thrives in tactical flexibility (e.g., false 9) while critics claim United’s system lacks creativity to exploit him.
-
Key Hashtags:
- #LukakuAtOldTrafford (speculative memes, fan art)
- #GLH (Gareth Southgate’s England legacy, linking Lukaku to a "prestige" signing)
- #RedDevil (neutral discussions on transfer feasibility)
- #TenHagUnited (tactical debates on Lukaku’s role)
-
Ultras & Petitions:
- No official ultras petitions, but r/ManUtd threads show ~55% support for a move, contingent on a fee below £40M. Some fans compare him to Andy Cole (a "big-game" striker) rather than a long-term solution.
- Criticism centers on his age and Chelsea’s declining form, with pundits like Gary Neville questioning his Premier League relevance.
-
Real Madrid
-
Fan Sentiment: lukewarm but intrigued, with Galácticos supporters viewing him as a "veteran leader" to mentor younger stars like Vinícius Jr.. However, purists argue he lacks the "killer instinct" of past strikers (e.g., Karim Benzema) and question his willingness to play a deeper role. Financial constraints under Florentino Pérez also limit speculation, though a loan deal is occasionally floated.
-
Key Hashtags:
- #LukakuRealMadrid (speculative, often tied to "Galáctico" rumors)
- #HalaMadrid (neutral, broader club discussions)
- #LaDecima (implied as a potential replacement for Benzema)
-
Ultras & Petitions:
- Madridistas on Reddit (r/realmadrid) show ~30% support, with conditions on a free transfer or loan. Ultras like Sur Madridista have not engaged, but some fans compare him to Roberto Soldado (a short-term solution).
- Criticism focuses on his lack of Champions League pedigree and Chelsea’s instability.
-
AC Milan
-
Fan Sentiment: Enthusiastic, with Rossoneri fans seeing him as the ideal "big-game" striker to replace Osimhen and complement Rafael Leão. His Italian heritage and past success at Inter (2019–20 Serie A top scorer) bolster appeal. Some ultras (e.g., Fossa dei Leoni) argue Milan should pursue him despite financial fair play constraints, framing him as a "dream signing" for the Santiago Bernabéu Era.
-
<
As the Lukaku transfer saga unfolds, one certainty emerges: his next destination will be as much about financial reward as it is about tactical reinvention and personal fulfillment. Whether he targets a Champions League resurgence in Europe or a high-profile stint in Saudi Arabia, the decision hinges on aligning his remaining prime years with clubs that can maximize his strengths while addressing the challenges of modern football—aging out of peak form, evolving tactical demands, and the relentless pressure of transfer speculation. For Lukaku, the clock is ticking; for clubs, the stakes could not be higher.
|
Leave a Comment
Comments are moderated before appearing. The data you submit is processed according to the Privacy Policy of payroll.mebs.edu.pk.